Article 7421

Title of the article

Features of the structure and temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of small artificial reservoirs in urbanized territories (by the example of Penza) 

Authors

Tamara G. Stojko, Candidate of biological sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the sub-department of zoology and ecology, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: tgstojko@mail.ru
Victoria A. Senkevich, Candidate of biological sciences, assistant of the sub-department of zoology and ecology, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: viktoriya0606@mail.ru
Julija A. Pastuchova, Master degree student, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: yuliya.pastukhova.98@mail.ru 

Index UDK

574.5(285.2) 

DOI

10.21685/2307-9150-2021-4-7

Abstract

Background. The study of the zooplankton communities of small artificial reservoirs in urbanized territories expands knowledge about the structure, functioning and formation of hydrobiocenoses, which make a significant contribution to the conservation of biological diversity. These ponds require monitoring and treatment planning. The purpose of the research is to study the species diversity and dynamics of the zooplankton community in a small artificial reservoir, as well as to reveal the similarity with closely located water bodies. Materials and methods. Zooplankton samples were taken from April to November 2016–2017. Cameral processing of samples was carried out according to generally accepted methods. Analyzing the degree of development of the zooplankton community, we took into account the species diversity, abundance (N) thousand ind./m3 and biomass (B) g/m3, the index of the frequency of occurrence, and the complex of dominant species in terms of abundance. Using the Shennon index, the degree of complexity of the zooplankton community and the trophic status of the dug reservoir were established. The species composition of the this zooplankton was compared with the species richness of the Sura river within the city and Arbekovskiy pond. Results. The research presents data on the species composition of zooplankton (129 species and forms), including two new species for the Penza region: Limnias melicerta and Cephalodella sterea. Information on the ecology and biology of certain zooplankton species (Cephalodella ventripes, Keratella irregularis, Asplanchna girodi, A. priodonta) has been expanded. The dependence of structural parameters on water temperature and precipitation has been established. This dug reservoir is polluted with organic matter, as evidenced by the Shannon index, which was used to determine the degree of complexity of the zooplankton community. However, the dynamics of this index and, consequently, the trophic status are changeable. Conclusions. In the dug pond, the zooplankton community at 3/4 consists of zooplankters from the nearby Arbekovskiy pond and the Sura river within the city. The rest of the objects got into the reservoir from small streams and, possibly, temporary reservoirs, as well as water bodies located at a greater distance. 

Key words

dug water body, zooplankton community, species structure, seasonal dynamics 

 

 Download PDF

References

1. Sinitskiy A.V. Features of the structural organization of zooplanktocenoses of small water bodies of urbanized territories. PhD abstract. Samara: SGU, 2004:20. (In Russ.)
2. Gerasimov Yu.L. Zooplankton as a component of hydrobiocenoses of urban ponds. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonauchnaya seriya = Bulletin of Samara University. Natural sciences. 2007;(8):39–49. (In Russ.)
3. Lobunicheva E.V. Zooplankton of small water bodies in different landscapes of the Vologda region. PhD abstract. Borok: Vologod. gos. ped. un-t, 2009:19. (In Russ.)
4. Chantal A., MacPhee S., Keller W. Constructed ponds colonised by crustacean zooplankton local and regional influences. J. Limnol. 2013;72(3):524–553.
5. Leon D., Penalver P., Casas J. [et al.]. Zooplankton richness in farm ponds of Andalusia (Southern Spain). A comparison with natural wetlands. Limnetica. 2010;29(1):153–162.
6. Gerasimov Yu.L., Klenova N.A., Orlova S.A. Aerobic and facultative anaerobic microbiota of urban water bodies (Samara). Povolzhskiy ekologicheskiy zhurnal = Volga ecological journal. 2016;(1):41–48. (In Russ.)
7. Pogoda v Penzenskoy oblasti = The weather in Penza region. (In Russ.). Available at: www.pogodaiklimat.ru (accessed 01.01.2020).
8. Mordukhay-Boltovskiy F.D. (ed.). Metodika izucheniya biogeotsenozov vnutrennikh vodoemov = Methodology for studying biogeocenoses of inland water bodies. Moscow: Nauka, 1975:254. (In Russ.)
9. Shitikov V.K., Rozenberg G.S., Zinchenko T.D. Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: metody sistemnoy identifikatsii = Quantitative hydroecology: methods of system identification. Tolyatti: IEVB RAN, 2003:463. (In Russ.)
10. Paliy V.F. On quantitative indicators in the processing of faunistic materials. Zoologicheskiy zhurnal = Zoological journal. 1961;60(1):3–12. (In Russ.)
11. Kownacki A. Taxocens of Chironomidae in streams of the Polish Hight Tatra, Mts. Acta Hydrobiol. 1971;13(2):439–463.
12. Andronikova I.N. Strukturno-funktsional'naya organizatsiya zooplanktona ozernykh ekosistem raznykh troficheskikh tipov = Structural and functional organization of zooplankton in lake ecosystems of different trophic types. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 1996: 189. (In Russ.)
13. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologica electronica. 2001;4(1):9.
14. Senkevich V.A. Species structure of zooplankton communities in small rivers and artificial reservoirs in the forest-steppe zone of the Volga Upland (on the example of the Penza region). PhD abstact. Penza, 2017:27. (In Russ.)
15. Pastukhova Yu.A. The state of the zooplankton community of the Sura river (Penza). Ekologicheskiy sbornik 7: Trudy molodykh uchenykh. Biologicheskie nauki = Environmental collection 7: Proceedings of the young scientists. Biological sciences. Tolyatti, 2019:356–360. (In Russ.)
16. Stoyko T.G., Mazey Yu.A., Senkevich V.A. Planktonnye kolovratki penzenskikh vodoemov = Planktonic rotifers of Penza water bodies. Penza: Izd-vo PGU, 2016:166. (In Russ.)
17. Chuykov Yu.S. Materialy k kadastru planktonnykh bespozvonochnykh basseyna Volgi i Severnogo Kaspiya. Kolovratki (Rotatoria) = Materials for the cadastre of planktonic invertebrates in the Volga and Northern Caspian basins. The rotifers (Rotatoria). Tol'yatti: IEVB RAN, 2000:196. (In Russ.)
18. Kutikova L.A. Kolovratki fauny SSSR = The ritifers of the USSR fauna. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe otdelenie, 1970:744. (In Russ.)
19. Monakov A.V. Pitanie presnovodnykh bespozvonochnykh = Feeding freshwater invertebrates. Moscow: In-t problem ekologii i evolyutsii im. A.N. Severtsova, 1998:319. (In Russ.) 

 

Дата создания: 28.02.2022 09:15
Дата обновления: 28.02.2022 12:27